
He insisted: ‘Adam can be argued as one of the best players to have played the game so I think the comparisons are a little bit disrespectful to him because I’ve only just started.’ Gilchrist’s explosive batting, which saw him finish his career with a Test average of 47.60 after a decade in the Australia side, redefined the role of the keeper.
Yet Haddin says England’s fans, with the first Ashes Test in Cardiff just 19 days away, should not expect the same pyrotechnics when he comes to the crease this summer. ‘Adam is one of the greats who played the game,’ he said. ‘With the bat he can take the game away from you inside a session so I don’t think you’ll see any of that flamboyance from me.’ The New South Wales keeper spent seven years as Gilchrist’s understudy and when he did play, his work behind the stumps was found wanting in India.
But his form improved after a first Test century against New Zealand. He added: ‘It was a shaky start, you obviously get tested a lot more in this environment. I think in the last six months I’ve begun to understand what international cricket is like and I’m starting to feel a lot more comfortable.’
Source {Metro}
1 comment:
Well yes in my opinion Brad is correct however this does not take away the fact he is also a fine cricketer...I for one would never compare him with Gilly at this moment of course.
I hope Brad has a fine career ahead of him...personally I wish him well
Post a Comment